T. Sathyaraj vs V. Madhan — 228/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTJ270004692024
Next Hearing
07th July 2026
Filing Number
423/2024
Filing Date
24-04-2024
Registration No
228/2024
Registration Date
24-04-2024
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvidaimaruthur
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
T. Sathyaraj
Adv. R.Vimalraj
Respondent(s)
V. Madhan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 11-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 05-02-2026 | Part Heard |
| 10-01-2026 | Part Heard |
| 07-01-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a witness deposition document, not a court order with a final ruling. Witness PW-1 (Sathyaraj, age 42) testified before the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate at Thiruvidaimaruthur on 10.01.2025 regarding a loan dispute case (STC.228/2024). The witness deposed that he received loans totaling ₹11,00,000 from the opposing party across three dates (2017-2022), attempted to deposit ₹9,00,000 via bank cheque on 01.04.2021, but the cheque was returned on 12.04.2023 due to "Account closed," and subsequently filed a complaint seeking compensation under the Consumer Protection Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a witness deposition document, not a court order with a final ruling. Witness PW-1 (Sathyaraj, age 42) testified before the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate at Thiruvidaimaruthur on 10.01.2025 regarding a loan dispute case (STC.228/2024). The witness deposed that he received loans totaling ₹11,00,000 from the opposing party across three dates (2017-2022), attempted to deposit ₹9,00,000 via bank cheque on 01.04.2021, but the cheque was returned on 12.04.2023 due to "Account closed," and subsequently filed a complaint seeking compensation under the Consumer Protection Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts