SI of Police, Thiruvidaimaruthur vs Abirami — 64/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 28th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTJ270004362022

Filing Number

335/2022

Filing Date

06-Aug-2022

Registration No

64/2022

Registration Date

06-Aug-2022

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvidaimaruthur

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

Decision Date

28-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 19-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

79

Police Station

Thiruvidaimarudur Police Station

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SI of Police, Thiruvidaimaruthur

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Abirami

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 294(b) and 324, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The complainant's testimony was inconsistent with the investigating officer's statement, and the accused was discharged under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  8. 11-Mar-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  9. 31-Dec-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  10. 12-Sep-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  11. 14-Jul-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  12. 09-May-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  13. 05-Feb-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  14. 27-Nov-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  15. 21-Sep-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  16. 08-Jul-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  17. 15-May-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  18. 01-Mar-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  19. 05-Jan-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  20. 22-Nov-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  21. 09-Oct-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  22. 29-Sep-2023

    Questioning

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  23. 01-Jul-2023

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  24. 07-Jun-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  25. 19-Apr-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  26. 20-Feb-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  27. 01-Feb-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  28. 16-Dec-2022

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  29. 28-Oct-2022

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  30. 03-Oct-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 06-Aug-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 64/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 294(b) and 324, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The complainant's testimony was inconsistent with the investigating officer's statement, and the accused was discharged under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case