Karthikeyan vs Selvaraj — 233/2022
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138 r/w 142. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 22nd May 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTJ270004062022
Next Hearing
22nd May 2026
Filing Number
305/2022
Filing Date
01-08-2022
Registration No
233/2022
Registration Date
01-08-2022
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvidaimaruthur
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Karthikeyan
Adv. B.Rethinakumar, B.A.,B.L.,
Respondent(s)
Selvaraj
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 01-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 11-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 25-02-2026 | Part Heard |
| 04-02-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
This is a witness deposition document (not a final court order) in case STC.233/2022 before the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimaruthur. The witness (PW-1), a 52-year-old, testified on 09.10.2024 that the defendant borrowed ₹1,50,000 on 21.01.2022 for family expenses, issued a cheque on 22.02.2022 which was dishonored on 03.03.2022 due to insufficient funds, and the witness filed a complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act seeking compensation for the cheque dishonor. Cross-examination of the defendant's counsel was deferred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a witness deposition document (not a final court order) in case STC.233/2022 before the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimaruthur. The witness (PW-1), a 52-year-old, testified on 09.10.2024 that the defendant borrowed ₹1,50,000 on 21.01.2022 for family expenses, issued a cheque on 22.02.2022 which was dishonored on 03.03.2022 due to insufficient funds, and the witness filed a complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act seeking compensation for the cheque dishonor. Cross-examination of the defendant's counsel was deferred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts