SI of police, Thiruneelakudi vs Natarajan and 1 other — 37/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),506(2),326. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTJ270003222021
Next Hearing
22nd July 2026
Filing Number
298/2021
Filing Date
25-06-2021
Registration No
37/2021
Registration Date
25-06-2021
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvidaimaruthur
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur
FIR Details
FIR Number
108
Police Station
Thiruneelakudi Police Station
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI of police, Thiruneelakudi
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Natarajan and 1 other
Revathy
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 01-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 25-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 11-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 18-02-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary This document records witness depositions (Chapter XXIII, CrPC) in case CC.37/2021 before the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimaruthur. Two witnesses—Saminathan (age 53) and Latha (age 47)—testified on 10.07.2025 regarding an assault incident allegedly involving three persons, including one named Kirthana. The witnesses testified that they were beaten due to a longstanding property/boundary dispute dating back 15 years, and confirmed their FIR statements and cross-examination by the accused parties before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This document records witness depositions (Chapter XXIII, CrPC) in case CC.37/2021 before the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimaruthur. Two witnesses—Saminathan (age 53) and Latha (age 47)—testified on 10.07.2025 regarding an assault incident allegedly involving three persons, including one named Kirthana. The witnesses testified that they were beaten due to a longstanding property/boundary dispute dating back 15 years, and confirmed their FIR statements and cross-examination by the accused parties before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts