Sub Inspector of Police, Thiruneelakudi Polic Station vs Surenthar and Three others Advocate - Tr.A.Elangovan — 61/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324,506(2). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 28th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTJ270002092020

Filing Number

209/2020

Filing Date

19-Aug-2020

Registration No

61/2020

Registration Date

19-Aug-2020

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvidaimaruthur

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

Decision Date

28-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 19-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

26

Police Station

Thiruneelakudi Police Station

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324,506(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sub Inspector of Police, Thiruneelakudi Polic Station

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Surenthar and Three others Advocate - Tr.A.Elangovan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary: The court acquitted three accused persons under IPC Sections 294(b), 324(2), and 506(ii) after finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The key evidence presented—primarily the complainant's testimony and medical certificates—was found to be inconsistent, contradictory, and insufficient to establish guilt. The court observed that the complainant gave conflicting statements and the investigating officer's account lacked credibility, consequently ordering the accused's release under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  8. 13-Feb-2026

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  9. 27-Nov-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  10. 05-Nov-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  11. 22-Oct-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  12. 30-Jul-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  13. 12-May-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  14. 01-Mar-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  15. 08-Jan-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  16. 18-Nov-2024

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  17. 19-Oct-2024

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  18. 23-Sep-2024

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  19. 19-Aug-2024

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  20. 24-Jun-2024

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  21. 22-Apr-2024

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  22. 27-Mar-2024

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  23. 02-Feb-2024

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  24. 01-Dec-2023

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  25. 25-Sep-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  26. 05-Jul-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  27. 15-May-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  28. 15-Mar-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  29. 06-Jan-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  30. 09-Nov-2022

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  31. 07-Sep-2022

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  32. 08-Jul-2022

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  33. 22-Apr-2022

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  34. 24-Jan-2022

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  35. 17-Nov-2021

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  36. 03-Sep-2021

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  37. 28-Jun-2021

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  38. 16-Apr-2021

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  39. 19-Mar-2021

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  40. 23-Feb-2021

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  41. 04-Jan-2021

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

  42. 11-Nov-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  43. 19-Aug-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 61/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court acquitted three accused persons under IPC Sections 294(b), 324(2), and 506(ii) after finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The key evidence presented—primarily the complainant's testimony and medical certificates—was found to be inconsistent, contradictory, and insufficient to establish guilt. The court observed that the complainant gave conflicting statements and the investigating officer's account lacked credibility, consequently ordering the accused's release under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case