B.Sitthanathan vs R.Ramasubramanian — 3/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223, 395. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTJ270000392025
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
Filing Number
37/2025
Filing Date
07-01-2025
Registration No
3/2025
Registration Date
07-01-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvidaimaruthur
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
B.Sitthanathan
Adv. Mr. S.Vijayakumar. B.A. B.L.
Respondent(s)
R.Ramasubramanian
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Part Heard |
| 01-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 25-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 11-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 05-02-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary Witness PW-1 (Siddhanathan, age 46) gave deposition on 01.04.2026 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimaruthur (Case STC 3/2025). The witness testified regarding a cheque for ₹4,00,000 dated 01.11.2024 that was returned on 13.11.2024, and related correspondence. The witness filed a complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act against the opposing party for fraudulently issuing the cheque without sufficient bank funds, seeking compensation for the loss. Cross-examination by the opposing party's counsel was deferred to a subsequent hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary Witness PW-1 (Siddhanathan, age 46) gave deposition on 01.04.2026 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimaruthur (Case STC 3/2025). The witness testified regarding a cheque for ₹4,00,000 dated 01.11.2024 that was returned on 13.11.2024, and related correspondence. The witness filed a complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act against the opposing party for fraudulently issuing the cheque without sufficient bank funds, seeking compensation for the loss. Cross-examination by the opposing party's counsel was deferred to a subsequent hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts