Annaiyan vs Selvi Advocate - M.P.Manoharan, M.A., B.L.,D.L.L.A.L., D.L.T., M.Phil., — 8/2022
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 7,1,25(d), 27(c). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTJ270000352022
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
Filing Number
8/2022
Filing Date
09-02-2022
Registration No
8/2022
Registration Date
09-02-2022
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvidaimaruthur
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Annaiyan
Adv. M.S. Raphealraj,B.A.,B.L.,
Respondent(s)
Selvi Advocate - M.P.Manoharan, M.A., B.L.,D.L.L.A.L., D.L.T., M.Phil.,
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 11-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 06-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 25-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 18-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition was allowed. The District Arbitration and Civil Judge Court at Tiruvidaimaruthur granted permission to recognize Mr. Rayal as the Power of Attorney agent to represent the petitioner in the case, as the petitioner is unable to personally attend court due to ongoing medical treatment. No costs were imposed on either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition was allowed. The District Arbitration and Civil Judge Court at Tiruvidaimaruthur granted permission to recognize Mr. Rayal as the Power of Attorney agent to represent the petitioner in the case, as the petitioner is unable to personally attend court due to ongoing medical treatment. No costs were imposed on either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts