Sub Inspector of Police,Thiruvidaimarudur. vs Murugan @ Senthil Kumar and 2 others Advocate - Tr.J.Manikandan, B.Com., B.L., — 19/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,506(ii),352. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTJ270000192020
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
Filing Number
19/2020
Filing Date
05-08-2020
Registration No
19/2020
Registration Date
07-08-2020
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvidaimaruthur
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur
FIR Details
FIR Number
97
Police Station
Thiruvidaimarudur Police Station
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sub Inspector of Police,Thiruvidaimarudur.
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Murugan @ Senthil Kumar and 2 others Advocate - Tr.J.Manikandan, B.Com., B.L.,
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-05-2026 | Part Heard |
| 08-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 25-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 11-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 06-03-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
This document contains depositions of witnesses (PW-3 and PW-4) recorded on 21.02.2024 in the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvidaimaruthur, in case CC 19/2020. The witnesses were sworn under the Oaths Act 1969 and testified regarding their knowledge of an incident involving alleged assault; both witnesses acknowledged that three accused were absent and a petition under Section 317 CrPC was filed and allowed for their examination. The depositions were recorded in Tamil, transcribed, read back to the witnesses, and accepted as accurate by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document contains depositions of witnesses (PW-3 and PW-4) recorded on 21.02.2024 in the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvidaimaruthur, in case CC 19/2020. The witnesses were sworn under the Oaths Act 1969 and testified regarding their knowledge of an incident involving alleged assault; both witnesses acknowledged that three accused were absent and a petition under Section 317 CrPC was filed and allowed for their examination. The depositions were recorded in Tamil, transcribed, read back to the witnesses, and accepted as accurate by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts