Minor A Arsath Babu Rep By His Mother Natural Gurdian And Next Friend Sathya vs K Sasikumar — 307/2023

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 141163A163B166&182. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 08-Jun-2026 this date has passed

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTJ190003922025

e-Filing Number

08-11-2023

Filing Number

359/2025

Filing Date

17-Nov-2023

Registration No

307/2023

Registration Date

17-Nov-2023

Court

Additional CJM Court, Kumbakonam

Judge

3-Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam

Last updated 19-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 141163A163B166&182

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Minor A Arsath Babu Rep By His Mother Natural Gurdian And Next Friend Sathya

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.K Sasikumar

  2. 2.K Venithkumar

  3. 3.Sbi General Insurance Co Ltd

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam

  7. 13-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam

  8. 05-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam

  9. 29-Jan-2026

    Deposition of WitnessView PDF

    This is a witness deposition document (MCOP No. 307/2023) recorded on 29.01.2026 before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Kumbakonam. The witness, Sri. Raja, testified regarding his knowledge of the complainant's family spanning 5-6 years, and his testimony was admitted and acknowledged as correct by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 29-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam

  11. 19-Jan-2026

    Deposition of WitnessView PDF

  12. 19-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam

  13. 02-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam

  14. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam

  15. 03-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam

  16. 24-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam

  17. 19-Nov-2025

    Deposition of WitnessView PDF

  18. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam

  19. 11-Nov-2025

    Deposition of WitnessView PDF

  20. 11-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam

  21. 03-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam

  22. 28-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam

  23. 14-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam

  24. 25-Sep-2025

    Deposition of WitnessView PDF

  25. 25-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam

  26. 17-Sep-2025

    Deposition of WitnessView PDF

  27. 17-Sep-2025

    Enquiry

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam

  28. 08-Sep-2025

    Enquiry

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam

  29. 25-Aug-2025

    Enquiry

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam

  30. 04-Aug-2025

    Enquiry

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam

  31. 31-Jul-2025

    Enquiry

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam

  32. 22-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 17-Nov-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 307/2023

casestatus.in Summary

This is a witness deposition document (MCOP No. 307/2023) recorded on 29.01.2026 before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Kumbakonam. The witness, Sri. Raja, testified regarding his knowledge of the complainant's family spanning 5-6 years, and his testimony was admitted and acknowledged as correct by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case