Vinoth vs Amutha Advocate - A.Ravi — 59/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140,166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTJ190001302026

Evidence

Next Hearing

02nd June 2026

e-Filing Number

09-01-2024

Filing Number

129/2026

Filing Date

18-01-2024

Registration No

59/2024

Registration Date

18-01-2024

Court

Additional CJM Court, Kumbakonam

Judge

3-Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140,166

Petitioner(s)

Vinoth

Adv. K.Raja

Respondent(s)

Amutha Advocate - A.Ravi

The Oriendal Insurance Company

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam

21-04-2026

Evidence

06-04-2026

Evidence

16-03-2026

Evidence

11-03-2026

Evidence

23-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

09-02-2026
Deposition of Witness

Court Order Summary Case: MCOP No. 59/2024, Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam | Date: 09.02.2026 Outcome: This is a witness deposition (not a final court order) in a motor vehicle accident case. The plaintiff's witness testified about a collision between two vehicles on 05.08.2023. The defendant (cross-examined witness) admitted to the accident but claimed contributory negligence, arguing he was driving at normal speed and the plaintiff's vehicle collided with him. The case documents medical records, vehicle repair bills, and insurance details. No final judgment/order has been issued yet—the case remains under examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case: MCOP No. 59/2024, Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam | Date: 09.02.2026 Outcome: This is a witness deposition (not a final court order) in a motor vehicle accident case. The plaintiff's witness testified about a collision between two vehicles on 05.08.2023. The defendant (cross-examined witness) admitted to the accident but claimed contributory negligence, arguing he was driving at normal speed and the plaintiff's vehicle collided with him. The case documents medical records, vehicle repair bills, and insurance details. No final judgment/order has been issued yet—the case remains under examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Additional CJM Court, Kumbakonam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case