JAYALAKSHMI M vs VANNAMAYIL A — 338/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTJ190001262026

Part Heard

Next Hearing

04th June 2026

e-Filing Number

03-08-2024

Filing Number

125/2026

Filing Date

08-08-2024

Registration No

338/2024

Registration Date

29-08-2024

Court

Additional CJM Court, Kumbakonam

Judge

3-Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

JAYALAKSHMI M

Adv. G TAMILSELVAN

MANIKANDAN M

Adv. G TAMILSELVAN

KARTHIK M

Adv. G TAMILSELVAN

LAKSHMI A

Adv. G TAMILSELVAN

Respondent(s)

VANNAMAYIL A

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER MAYILADUTHURAI

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam

17-04-2026

Part Heard

07-04-2026

Evidence

27-03-2026

Amendment

11-03-2026

Amendment

23-02-2026

Amendment

Interim Orders

17-04-2026
Deposition of Witness

Summary This is a witness examination record (MCOP No. 338-2024) from the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam dated 17.04.2026, documenting the testimony of a 30-year-old auto driver named Karthikeyan regarding a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 26.06.2024 at 9:00-9:05 PM involving a collision between an auto-rickshaw and an ambulance. The witness provided detailed testimony about the accident circumstances, vehicle movements, road conditions, and driver conduct, which was read over and acknowledged as correct by the witness in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a witness examination record (MCOP No. 338-2024) from the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam dated 17.04.2026, documenting the testimony of a 30-year-old auto driver named Karthikeyan regarding a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 26.06.2024 at 9:00-9:05 PM involving a collision between an auto-rickshaw and an ambulance. The witness provided detailed testimony about the accident circumstances, vehicle movements, road conditions, and driver conduct, which was read over and acknowledged as correct by the witness in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Additional CJM Court, Kumbakonam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case