KODIPOVUNU K vs SARAVANAN M — 360/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTJ190001042026

e-Filing Number

03-09-2024

Filing Number

103/2026

Filing Date

03-Sep-2024

Registration No

360/2024

Registration Date

10-Sep-2024

Court

Additional CJM Court, Kumbakonam

Judge

3-Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat

Last updated 19-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KODIPOVUNU K

    Adv. G TAMILSELVAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SARAVANAN M

  2. 2.GUNASEKAR M

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court at Kumbakonam settled a road accident compensation case through Lok Adalat on March 14, 2026. The petitioner, who originally claimed Rs. 20,00,000, agreed to accept Rs. 3,00,000 in full settlement from the respondents (Saravanan and Gunasekar). The court approved the compromise settlement with both parties consenting voluntarily, and directed the petitioner to produce bank details for fund transfer and refund of court fees as per the Legal Services Authorities Act 1987. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam

  5. 10-Feb-2026

    Enquiry

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam

  6. 29-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 03-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 360/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court at Kumbakonam settled a road accident compensation case through Lok Adalat on March 14, 2026. The petitioner, who originally claimed Rs. 20,00,000, agreed to accept Rs. 3,00,000 in full settlement from the respondents (Saravanan and Gunasekar). The court approved the compromise settlement with both parties consenting voluntarily, and directed the petitioner to produce bank details for fund transfer and refund of court fees as per the Legal Services Authorities Act 1987. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case