Arbuthamary vs Raju Advocate - R. Balasubramanian — 304/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTJ190000992026

Appearance

Next Hearing

03rd June 2026

Filing Number

98/2026

Filing Date

25-07-2024

Registration No

304/2024

Registration Date

26-07-2024

Court

Additional CJM Court, Kumbakonam

Judge

3-Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

Arbuthamary

Adv. G TAMILSELVAN

Respondent(s)

Raju Advocate - R. Balasubramanian

Icici Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd And Its Manager

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam

28-04-2026

Appearance

15-04-2026

Part Heard

01-04-2026

Part Heard

23-03-2026

Counter

11-03-2026

Counter

Interim Orders

01-04-2026
Deposition of Witness

Summary: In MCOP No. 304/2024 before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam (dated 01.04.2026), the court recorded the cross-examination of a witness in a motor vehicle accident case. The witness testified regarding injuries sustained, medical treatment received at government and private hospitals between June 17-21, 2024, and subsequent treatment. The court documented the witness's testimony regarding lack of supporting medical documents, insurance claims, and vehicle documentation issues, with the witness acknowledging gaps in evidence for claimed compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In MCOP No. 304/2024 before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam (dated 01.04.2026), the court recorded the cross-examination of a witness in a motor vehicle accident case. The witness testified regarding injuries sustained, medical treatment received at government and private hospitals between June 17-21, 2024, and subsequent treatment. The court documented the witness's testimony regarding lack of supporting medical documents, insurance claims, and vehicle documentation issues, with the witness acknowledging gaps in evidence for claimed compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Additional CJM Court, Kumbakonam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case