Arbuthamary vs Raju Advocate - R. Balasubramanian — 304/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTJ190000992026
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
Filing Number
98/2026
Filing Date
25-07-2024
Registration No
304/2024
Registration Date
26-07-2024
Court
Additional CJM Court, Kumbakonam
Judge
3-Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Arbuthamary
Adv. G TAMILSELVAN
Respondent(s)
Raju Advocate - R. Balasubramanian
Icici Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd And Its Manager
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam
Appearance
Part Heard
Part Heard
Counter
Counter
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Appearance |
| 15-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 01-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 23-03-2026 | Counter |
| 11-03-2026 | Counter |
Interim Orders
Summary: In MCOP No. 304/2024 before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam (dated 01.04.2026), the court recorded the cross-examination of a witness in a motor vehicle accident case. The witness testified regarding injuries sustained, medical treatment received at government and private hospitals between June 17-21, 2024, and subsequent treatment. The court documented the witness's testimony regarding lack of supporting medical documents, insurance claims, and vehicle documentation issues, with the witness acknowledging gaps in evidence for claimed compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In MCOP No. 304/2024 before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam (dated 01.04.2026), the court recorded the cross-examination of a witness in a motor vehicle accident case. The witness testified regarding injuries sustained, medical treatment received at government and private hospitals between June 17-21, 2024, and subsequent treatment. The court documented the witness's testimony regarding lack of supporting medical documents, insurance claims, and vehicle documentation issues, with the witness acknowledging gaps in evidence for claimed compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts