M/s Cholamandalam Investment And Finance Lid vs NARAYANA RENGASAMY SIVASUBIRAMANIYAN Advocate - Sarfaesi — 1137/2025
Case under Securitisationandreconstructionoffinancialassets&enforcementofsecurityinterestact Section 14(1)(2). Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 26th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTJ180057602025
e-Filing Number
30-10-2025
Filing Number
5745/2025
Filing Date
10-Nov-2025
Registration No
1137/2025
Registration Date
26-Dec-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Kumbakonam
Judge
2-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thanjavur @Kumbakonam
Decision Date
26-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
Last updated 19-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/s Cholamandalam Investment And Finance Lid
Adv. sudha R
Respondent(s)
-
1.NARAYANA RENGASAMY SIVASUBIRAMANIYAN Advocate - Sarfaesi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Thanjavur allowed Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act 2002 to take possession of mortgaged property from defaulting borrowers who failed to repay Rs. 22,89,171/- after proper demand and possession notices. An Advocate-Commissioner was appointed to take physical possession of the property and hand it over to the bank, with authority to break open the building if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thanjavur @Kumbakonam
-
11-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thanjavur @Kumbakonam
-
26-Feb-2026
Orders
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thanjavur @Kumbakonam
-
17-Feb-2026
Appearance
Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kumbakonam
-
27-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1137/2025
Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Thanjavur allowed Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act 2002 to take possession of mortgaged property from defaulting borrowers who failed to repay Rs. 22,89,171/- after proper demand and possession notices. An Advocate-Commissioner was appointed to take physical possession of the property and hand it over to the bank, with authority to break open the building if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts