M/s Cholamandalam Investment And Finance Lid vs NARAYANA RENGASAMY SIVASUBIRAMANIYAN Advocate - Sarfaesi — 1137/2025

Case under Securitisationandreconstructionoffinancialassets&enforcementofsecurityinterestact Section 14(1)(2). Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 26th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTJ180057602025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

30-10-2025

Filing Number

5745/2025

Filing Date

10-11-2025

Registration No

1137/2025

Registration Date

26-12-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Kumbakonam

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thanjavur @Kumbakonam

Decision Date

26th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Acts & Sections

SecuritisationandReconstructionofFinancialAssets&EnforcementofSecurityInterestAct Section 14(1)(2)

Petitioner(s)

M/s Cholamandalam Investment And Finance Lid

Adv. sudha R

Respondent(s)

NARAYANA RENGASAMY SIVASUBIRAMANIYAN Advocate - Sarfaesi

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thanjavur @Kumbakonam

26-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Enquiry

26-02-2026

Orders

17-02-2026

Appearance

27-01-2026

Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

26-03-2026
Copy of Order

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Thanjavur allowed Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act 2002 to take possession of mortgaged property from defaulting borrowers who failed to repay Rs. 22,89,171/- after proper demand and possession notices. An Advocate-Commissioner was appointed to take physical possession of the property and hand it over to the bank, with authority to break open the building if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Thanjavur allowed Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act 2002 to take possession of mortgaged property from defaulting borrowers who failed to repay Rs. 22,89,171/- after proper demand and possession notices. An Advocate-Commissioner was appointed to take physical possession of the property and hand it over to the bank, with authority to break open the building if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Kumbakonam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case