EQUITAS SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD REP BY ITS LEGAL MANAGER vs SELLAPPA Advocate - Sarfaesi — 1149/2025

Case under Securitisationandreconstructionoffinancialassets&enforcementofsecurityinterestact Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 20th April 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTJ180052992025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

14-10-2025

Filing Number

5285/2025

Filing Date

17-10-2025

Registration No

1149/2025

Registration Date

29-12-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Kumbakonam

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thanjavur @Kumbakonam

Decision Date

20th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Acts & Sections

SecuritisationandReconstructionofFinancialAssets&EnforcementofSecurityInterestAct Section 14

Petitioner(s)

EQUITAS SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD REP BY ITS LEGAL MANAGER

Adv. Mullai S

Respondent(s)

SELLAPPA Advocate - Sarfaesi

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thanjavur @Kumbakonam

20-04-2026

Disposed

09-04-2026

Orders

26-03-2026

Orders

11-03-2026

Enquiry

24-02-2026

Enquiry

Final Orders / Judgements

20-04-2026
Copy of Order

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Thanjavur allowed Equitas Small Finance Bank's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, against borrowers who defaulted on a Rs.10 lakh housing loan. The court appointed an Advocate-Commissioner to take possession of the mortgaged property and hand it over to the bank, finding that all statutory procedures (demand notice issued September 2022, possession notice issued June 2025, and newspaper publication) were properly followed and the respondents failed to raise any objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Thanjavur allowed Equitas Small Finance Bank's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, against borrowers who defaulted on a Rs.10 lakh housing loan. The court appointed an Advocate-Commissioner to take possession of the mortgaged property and hand it over to the bank, finding that all statutory procedures (demand notice issued September 2022, possession notice issued June 2025, and newspaper publication) were properly followed and the respondents failed to raise any objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Kumbakonam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case