Equitas Small Finance Bank ltd Rep by its Legal Manager vs TAMIZHARASI — 1143/2025

Case under Securitisationandreconstructionoffinancialassets&enforcementofsecurityinterestact Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 07th April 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTJ180052962025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

14-10-2025

Filing Number

5282/2025

Filing Date

17-10-2025

Registration No

1143/2025

Registration Date

29-12-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Kumbakonam

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thanjavur @Kumbakonam

Decision Date

07th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Acts & Sections

SecuritisationandReconstructionofFinancialAssets&EnforcementofSecurityInterestAct Section 14

Petitioner(s)

Equitas Small Finance Bank ltd Rep by its Legal Manager

Adv. Mullai S

Respondent(s)

TAMIZHARASI

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thanjavur @Kumbakonam

07-04-2026

Disposed

25-03-2026

Orders

11-03-2026

Enquiry

25-02-2026

Enquiry

04-02-2026

Orders

Final Orders / Judgements

07-04-2026
Copy of Order

Court Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Thanjavur allowed Equitas Small Finance Bank's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, granting the bank authority to take possession of mortgaged property from defaulting loan borrowers. The court appointed an Advocate-Commissioner to inspect the property, take physical possession with inventories, and hand it over to the bank after the respondents failed to repay their housing loan of Rs. 8,47,000 despite receiving demand and possession notices. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Court Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Thanjavur allowed Equitas Small Finance Bank's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, granting the bank authority to take possession of mortgaged property from defaulting loan borrowers. The court appointed an Advocate-Commissioner to inspect the property, take physical possession with inventories, and hand it over to the bank after the respondents failed to repay their housing loan of Rs. 8,47,000 despite receiving demand and possession notices. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Kumbakonam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case