HINDUJA HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED vs Ramakrishnan Advocate - Sarfaesi — 953/2025

Case under Securitisationandreconstructionoffinancialassets&enforcementofsecurityinterestact Section Sec14. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTJ180047772025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

22-09-2025

Filing Number

4766/2025

Filing Date

23-09-2025

Registration No

953/2025

Registration Date

30-10-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Kumbakonam

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thanjavur @Kumbakonam

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Acts & Sections

SecuritisationandReconstructionofFinancialAssets&EnforcementofSecurityInterestAct Section Sec14

Petitioner(s)

HINDUJA HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED

Adv. Karthick Raju

Respondent(s)

Ramakrishnan Advocate - Sarfaesi

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thanjavur @Kumbakonam

12-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Enquiry

26-02-2026

Orders

09-02-2026

Orders

19-01-2026

Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Copy of Order

The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Thanjavur granted Hinduja Housing Finance Bank's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, appointing an Advocate-Commissioner to take possession of the mortgaged property from the borrowers who defaulted on their Rs.26 lakh loan. The court found that the borrowers failed to repay the loan despite demand notices and authorized the Commissioner to break open the property if necessary, with the bank to bear the Commissioner's remuneration of Rs.20,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Thanjavur granted Hinduja Housing Finance Bank's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, appointing an Advocate-Commissioner to take possession of the mortgaged property from the borrowers who defaulted on their Rs.26 lakh loan. The court found that the borrowers failed to repay the loan despite demand notices and authorized the Commissioner to break open the property if necessary, with the bank to bear the Commissioner's remuneration of Rs.20,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Kumbakonam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case