HINDUJA HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED vs Ramakrishnan Advocate - Sarfaesi — 953/2025
Case under Securitisationandreconstructionoffinancialassets&enforcementofsecurityinterestact Section Sec14. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTJ180047772025
e-Filing Number
22-09-2025
Filing Number
4766/2025
Filing Date
23-Sep-2025
Registration No
953/2025
Registration Date
30-Oct-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Kumbakonam
Judge
2-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thanjavur @Kumbakonam
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
Last updated 19-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HINDUJA HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED
Adv. Karthick Raju
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ramakrishnan Advocate - Sarfaesi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Thanjavur granted Hinduja Housing Finance Bank's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, appointing an Advocate-Commissioner to take possession of the mortgaged property from the borrowers who defaulted on their Rs.26 lakh loan. The court found that the borrowers failed to repay the loan despite demand notices and authorized the Commissioner to break open the property if necessary, with the bank to bear the Commissioner's remuneration of Rs.20,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thanjavur @Kumbakonam
-
11-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thanjavur @Kumbakonam
-
26-Feb-2026
Orders
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thanjavur @Kumbakonam
-
09-Feb-2026
Orders
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thanjavur @Kumbakonam
-
19-Jan-2026
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thanjavur @Kumbakonam
-
08-Dec-2025
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thanjavur @Kumbakonam
-
14-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 953/2025
The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Thanjavur granted Hinduja Housing Finance Bank's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, appointing an Advocate-Commissioner to take possession of the mortgaged property from the borrowers who defaulted on their Rs.26 lakh loan. The court found that the borrowers failed to repay the loan despite demand notices and authorized the Commissioner to break open the property if necessary, with the bank to bear the Commissioner's remuneration of Rs.20,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts