M/S AU SALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED Represented by its Authorized officer Mr Utha Singh vs Oviya Thamaraiselvan Advocate - Sarfaesi — 1141/2025
Case under Securitisationandreconstructionoffinancialassets&enforcementofsecurityinterestact Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 06th April 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTJ180043472025
e-Filing Number
26-08-2025
Filing Number
4337/2025
Filing Date
28-08-2025
Registration No
1141/2025
Registration Date
26-12-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Kumbakonam
Judge
2-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thanjavur @Kumbakonam
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S AU SALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED Represented by its Authorized officer Mr Utha Singh
Adv. ASHOK KUMAR R
Respondent(s)
Oviya Thamaraiselvan Advocate - Sarfaesi
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thanjavur @Kumbakonam
Disposed
Orders
Orders
Orders
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-03-2026 | Orders |
| 11-03-2026 | Orders |
| 26-02-2026 | Orders |
| 18-02-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate allowed AU Small Finance Bank's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act 2002, granting the bank the right to take possession of a mortgaged property in Thanjavur. The court found that the respondents defaulted on a Rs. 10 lakh mortgage loan taken in December 2021, and after issuing statutory demand and possession notices in June and November 2024 respectively, the bank was entitled to enforcement action. An Advocate-Commissioner was appointed to inspect the property, take physical possession with inventories, and hand it over to the bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate allowed AU Small Finance Bank's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act 2002, granting the bank the right to take possession of a mortgaged property in Thanjavur. The court found that the respondents defaulted on a Rs. 10 lakh mortgage loan taken in December 2021, and after issuing statutory demand and possession notices in June and November 2024 respectively, the bank was entitled to enforcement action. An Advocate-Commissioner was appointed to inspect the property, take physical possession with inventories, and hand it over to the bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts