M/s Shriram Finance Ltd., Rep by its authorized signatory vs A.Parveen Banu Advocate - M.Soundararajan — 37/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O21, R11(2). Status: Steps. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.

EP - Execution Petition

CNR: TNTJ170004362024

Steps

Next Hearing

08th July 2026

Filing Number

37/2024

Filing Date

25-04-2024

Registration No

37/2024

Registration Date

25-04-2024

Court

Additional District Court, Kumbakonam

Judge

1-Additional District Judge,(FTC) , Kumbakonam

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O21, R11(2)
Ea/1/2025 Classification : 151 Petition Section M/s Shriram Finance Ltd., Rep by its authorized signatoryA.Parveen Banu
Ea/2/2025 Classification : 151 Petition Section M/s Shriram Finance Ltd., Rep by its authorized signatoryA.Parveen Banu
Ea/3/2025 Classification : 151 Petition Section M/s Shriram Finance Ltd., Rep by its authorized signatoryA.Parveen Banu

Petitioner(s)

M/s Shriram Finance Ltd., Rep by its authorized signatory

Adv. S. Mullai

Respondent(s)

A.Parveen Banu Advocate - M.Soundararajan

Senthilkumar

Adv. M.Soundararajan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Additional District Judge,(FTC) , Kumbakonam

15-04-2026

Steps

11-03-2026

Enquiry

06-03-2026

Enquiry

25-02-2026

Steps

23-01-2026

Issue of Service

Interim Orders

26-03-2025
Copy of Judgment

Summary: The execution petition filed by Shriram Finance Ltd. against A. Parveen Banu and V. Senthilkumar has been allowed. The court ordered attachment of the respondents' movable properties to realize Rs. 12,85,016/- based on an arbitral award dated 17.05.2018. The respondents' objections regarding lack of notice in the arbitration proceedings were rejected as the execution court cannot go beyond the award, and they must challenge the award through proper appellate forums if aggrieved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The execution petition filed by Shriram Finance Ltd. against A. Parveen Banu and V. Senthilkumar has been allowed. The court ordered attachment of the respondents' movable properties to realize Rs. 12,85,016/- based on an arbitral award dated 17.05.2018. The respondents' objections regarding lack of notice in the arbitration proceedings were rejected as the execution court cannot go beyond the award, and they must challenge the award through proper appellate forums if aggrieved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Additional District Court, Kumbakonam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case