T.Raju vs J.shanthi Advocate - M.S.Raphael Raj — 136/2019
Case under Specific Relief Act Section Order VII, R 1 CPC. Disposed: Contested--Partially Allowed on 17th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTJ170004252019
Filing Number
9719/2019
Filing Date
19-09-2019
Registration No
136/2019
Registration Date
19-09-2019
Court
Additional District Court, Kumbakonam
Judge
1-Additional District Judge,(FTC) , Kumbakonam
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Partially Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
T.Raju
Adv. Nedunchezhian.C
Respondent(s)
J.shanthi Advocate - M.S.Raphael Raj
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Additional District Judge,(FTC) , Kumbakonam
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 03-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-03-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 20-02-2026 | For further Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court dismissed plaintiff Raju's suit for specific performance of a land sale agreement dated 17.10.2018, finding he failed to demonstrate readiness and willingness to perform his contractual obligations, particularly by delaying legal action for seven months beyond the stipulated three-month execution period. However, the court granted Raju's alternative relief, directing defendant Shanthi to refund Rs. 11,16,921.60 (advance paid plus 12% annual interest from the date of filing until realization) with costs. Simultaneously, the court decreed the second suit in favor of Shanthi (property owner), granting permanent injunctions restraining Raju from interfering with her peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property or cutting boundary trees, as Shanthi retained ownership rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The court dismissed plaintiff Raju's suit for specific performance of a land sale agreement dated 17.10.2018, finding he failed to demonstrate readiness and willingness to perform his contractual obligations, particularly by delaying legal action for seven months beyond the stipulated three-month execution period. However, the court granted Raju's alternative relief, directing defendant Shanthi to refund Rs. 11,16,921.60 (advance paid plus 12% annual interest from the date of filing until realization) with costs. Simultaneously, the court decreed the second suit in favor of Shanthi (property owner), granting permanent injunctions restraining Raju from interfering with her peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property or cutting boundary trees, as Shanthi retained ownership rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts