Karthikeyan vs Samsath begum Advocate - M.Murali — 170/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1CPC. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTJ170002592018
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
Filing Number
170/2018
Filing Date
08-01-2019
Registration No
170/2018
Registration Date
08-01-2019
Court
Additional District Court, Kumbakonam
Judge
1-Additional District Judge,(FTC) , Kumbakonam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Karthikeyan
Adv. M.P. Manohararn
Respondent(s)
Samsath begum Advocate - M.Murali
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Additional District Judge,(FTC) , Kumbakonam
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 02-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 28-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a cross-examination record (not a final judgment) in O.S. No. 170/2018 before the Fast Track Court at Kumbakonam dated 04-03-2026. The defendant (Muhammadu Arip) testified regarding a civil dispute involving loan documents and property transaction agreements, denying allegations that he fraudulently obtained signatures and disputing the authenticity of certain documents (Exts. 1 and 2). The court recorded the witness's testimony, which was read over, interpreted, and acknowledged as correct by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a cross-examination record (not a final judgment) in O.S. No. 170/2018 before the Fast Track Court at Kumbakonam dated 04-03-2026. The defendant (Muhammadu Arip) testified regarding a civil dispute involving loan documents and property transaction agreements, denying allegations that he fraudulently obtained signatures and disputing the authenticity of certain documents (Exts. 1 and 2). The court recorded the witness's testimony, which was read over, interpreted, and acknowledged as correct by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts