M. Ravikumar vs M. Rajasekar — 116/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O. 7, R. 1. Status: For further Proceedings. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTJ170001852021
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
Filing Number
67/2021
Filing Date
14-07-2021
Registration No
116/2021
Registration Date
14-07-2021
Court
Additional District Court, Kumbakonam
Judge
1-Additional District Judge,(FTC) , Kumbakonam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M. Ravikumar
Adv. Ganesan R
Respondent(s)
M. Rajasekar
M. Pandian
Latha
Vignesh
Prema
Adv. Keerthiraj G
Usha
Adv. Keerthiraj G
Savithri
Adv. Keerthiraj
Mallika
Adv. Keerthiraj G
Vijaya
Adv. Keerthiraj G
Shanthi
Adv. Keerthiraj G
Amutha
Adv. Keerthiraj G
Leela
Adv. Keerthiraj G
M. Palanisamy
Adv. Suresh d
Revathy
Adv. D. suresh
Sujatha
Adv. Nandhagopalan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Additional District Judge,(FTC) , Kumbakonam
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 17-03-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 11-03-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 19-02-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 11-02-2026 | For further Proceedings |
Interim Orders
This document is a witness deposition record, not a court order with a substantive ruling. Witness Thirunavinkumar (age 59) was sworn in on 09-01-2026 before the Fast Track Court in Kumbakonam (Case O.S. 116/2021) and testified as the plaintiff, submitting various documentary evidence including property partition deeds, wills, and bank records dated between 1964-2020. The deposition was recorded, read over, and acknowledged as correct by the witness and the judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a witness deposition record, not a court order with a substantive ruling. Witness Thirunavinkumar (age 59) was sworn in on 09-01-2026 before the Fast Track Court in Kumbakonam (Case O.S. 116/2021) and testified as the plaintiff, submitting various documentary evidence including property partition deeds, wills, and bank records dated between 1964-2020. The deposition was recorded, read over, and acknowledged as correct by the witness and the judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts