Shanthi vs Raji — 48/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O.7, R.1. Disposed: Contested--Decreed with cost on 17th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTJ170000822021
Filing Number
26/2021
Filing Date
19-03-2021
Registration No
48/2021
Registration Date
19-03-2021
Court
Additional District Court, Kumbakonam
Judge
1-Additional District Judge,(FTC) , Kumbakonam
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed with cost
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shanthi
Adv. M.S. RabelRaj
Respondent(s)
Raji
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Additional District Judge,(FTC) , Kumbakonam
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 03-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for specific performance of a land sale agreement dated 17.10.2018, finding he failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform his contractual obligations, particularly by issuing notice only after a 7-month delay beyond the agreed 3-month execution period. However, the court granted the alternative relief of refunding the advance amount of Rs. 10,10,000 with 12% annual interest from the date of the suit. Simultaneously, the court decreed the defendant's suit for permanent injunction, restraining the plaintiff from interfering with peaceful possession and cutting boundary trees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for specific performance of a land sale agreement dated 17.10.2018, finding he failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform his contractual obligations, particularly by issuing notice only after a 7-month delay beyond the agreed 3-month execution period. However, the court granted the alternative relief of refunding the advance amount of Rs. 10,10,000 with 12% annual interest from the date of the suit. Simultaneously, the court decreed the defendant's suit for permanent injunction, restraining the plaintiff from interfering with peaceful possession and cutting boundary trees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts