Rajalaksmi vs Kaliyaperumal Advocate - Sivakumar.T — 14/2017
Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTJ170000342017
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
Filing Number
14/2017
Filing Date
17-02-2017
Registration No
14/2017
Registration Date
20-02-2017
Court
Additional District Court, Kumbakonam
Judge
1-Additional District Judge,(FTC) , Kumbakonam
Petitioner(s)
Rajalaksmi
Adv. L.Senthil Kumaran
Rani
Vasantha
Adv. M.Senthilkumar
Rani
Adv. M.Senthilkumar
vasantha
Adv. M.Senthilkumar
Respondent(s)
Kaliyaperumal Advocate - Sivakumar.T
Jaisankar
Adv. T. Sivakumar
Manikandan
Adv. T. Sivakumar
The Subregistrar,Papanasam
Adv. M.Senthil kumar
Jaisankar
Adv. T.Sivakumar
Manikandan
Adv. T. Sivakumar
papanasam
Adv. Ashokan G.P
sathya
Adv. R.Kabila
Minor santhosh
Adv. R.Kabila
minor Kishore
Adv. R.Kabila
Kumar
Adv. R.Kabila
Mariyammal
Jothi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Additional District Judge,(FTC) , Kumbakonam
Evidence
Trial
Trial
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-03-2026 | Trial |
| 11-03-2026 | Trial |
| 13-02-2026 | Trial |
| 23-01-2026 | Trial |
Interim Orders
This document is a deposition of witness (not a final court order with a substantive ruling). Witness Thiru Vasantha, aged 52, testified on 11-03-2026 in O.S. Case No. 14/2017 before the Fast Track Court, Kumbakonam, regarding property documents and inheritance matters. The witness's testimony was recorded, read over, interpreted in open court, and acknowledged as correct by the witness as per the Oaths Act, 1969. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a deposition of witness (not a final court order with a substantive ruling). Witness Thiru Vasantha, aged 52, testified on 11-03-2026 in O.S. Case No. 14/2017 before the Fast Track Court, Kumbakonam, regarding property documents and inheritance matters. The witness's testimony was recorded, read over, interpreted in open court, and acknowledged as correct by the witness as per the Oaths Act, 1969. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts