SI of Police, Naducauvery P.S. vs Rajesh Advocate - K. Karthikeyan, B.A., B.L., — 129/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,338IPC. Disposed: Uncontested--Acquitted on 28th March 2026.
STC - Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTJ160011602021
Filing Number
1156/2021
Filing Date
15-Apr-2021
Registration No
129/2021
Registration Date
15-Apr-2021
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvaiyaru
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
28-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Acquitted
Last updated 18-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
24
Police Station
Naducauvery Police Station
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SI of Police, Naducauvery P.S.
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rajesh Advocate - K. Karthikeyan, B.A., B.L.,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvaiyaru acquitted the accused in a rash driving case (IPC §279, 338) filed in 2016. The court invoked §258 Cr.P.C to stop proceedings, citing that the prosecution failed to produce witnesses despite conditional orders and prolonged delay violated the accused's right to speedy trial. Any executed bail bond shall be cancelled after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Mar-2026
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Feb-2026
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Jan-2026
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Jan-2026
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Dec-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Nov-2025
For further Proceedings
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Nov-2025
For further Proceedings
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Oct-2025
For further Proceedings
Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Oct-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Oct-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Sep-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Sep-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Jul-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Jul-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Jun-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Jun-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-May-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Jan-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Dec-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Sep-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Sep-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Jun-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Mar-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Dec-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Sep-2023
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Aug-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Aug-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Aug-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Aug-2023
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-May-2023
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Feb-2023
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Nov-2022
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Sep-2022
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Jun-2022
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Jun-2022
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-May-2022
Trial
-
30-Mar-2022
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Mar-2022
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Feb-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Jan-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Nov-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Oct-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Aug-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Aug-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Jun-2021
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Apr-2021
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Apr-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Apr-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 129/2021
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvaiyaru acquitted the accused in a rash driving case (IPC §279, 338) filed in 2016. The court invoked §258 Cr.P.C to stop proceedings, citing that the prosecution failed to produce witnesses despite conditional orders and prolonged delay violated the accused's right to speedy trial. Any executed bail bond shall be cancelled after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts