SI of Police, Budhalur P.S vs Sivakumar Advocate - K, Panneerselvam — 139/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,294(b),323,506(i). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTJ160008702022
Next Hearing
25th May 2026
Filing Number
775/2022
Filing Date
25-08-2022
Registration No
139/2022
Registration Date
25-08-2022
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvaiyaru
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate
FIR Details
FIR Number
220
Police Station
Budalur Police Station
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI of Police, Budhalur P.S
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Sivakumar Advocate - K, Panneerselvam
Thangarasu
Vasantha
Jayachandran
Jeevarani
Angamma
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Part Heard |
| 11-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 05-01-2026 | Part Heard |
| 25-11-2025 | Part Heard |
| 25-10-2025 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Criminal Case C.C. 139/2022 before the Tiruvannamalai Court, dated 09.01.2025, the first examination (examination-in-chief) was conducted. The witness denied knowledge of the case and claimed the seized materials were not his. The court allowed cross-examination by the prosecution and rejected the defendant's objections. The witness's testimony regarding a police investigation on 04.12.2018 was found inconsistent with his previous police statement. Defendants' cross-examination was dismissed as not required. The case status remains pending for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Criminal Case C.C. 139/2022 before the Tiruvannamalai Court, dated 09.01.2025, the first examination (examination-in-chief) was conducted. The witness denied knowledge of the case and claimed the seized materials were not his. The court allowed cross-examination by the prosecution and rejected the defendant's objections. The witness's testimony regarding a police investigation on 04.12.2018 was found inconsistent with his previous police statement. Defendants' cross-examination was dismissed as not required. The case status remains pending for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts