SI of Police, Maruvur P.S. vs Prabhu and 2 others — 266/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,336,506(i). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 17th March 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTJ160007932023

Case disposed

Filing Number

871/2023

Filing Date

14-08-2023

Registration No

266/2023

Registration Date

14-08-2023

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvaiyaru

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

24

Police Station

Maruvoor Police Station

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 294(b),323,336,506(i)
MP/1/2026 Classification : Others Section SI of Police, Maruvur P.S.Prakash

Petitioner(s)

SI of Police, Maruvur P.S.

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Prabhu and 2 others

Prakash

A3.Thulasiyayah

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate

17-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Part Heard

05-01-2026

Part Heard

15-12-2025

Part Heard

02-12-2025

Part Heard

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Copy of Order

Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Thiruvaiyaru acquitted all three accused persons (Prabhu, Prakash, and Thulasiayya) of charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 323, 326, and 506(i) relating to alleged assault and criminal intimidation on June 1, 2023. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant and eyewitnesses gave contradictory statements that undermined the government's case, and consequently discharged the accused under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Thiruvaiyaru acquitted all three accused persons (Prabhu, Prakash, and Thulasiayya) of charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 323, 326, and 506(i) relating to alleged assault and criminal intimidation on June 1, 2023. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant and eyewitnesses gave contradictory statements that undermined the government's case, and consequently discharged the accused under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvaiyaru All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case