M Guru vs Naducavery Police Station — 99/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b), 115(2), 118(A), 351(3). Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTJ160005712026

e-Filing Number

03-03-2026

Filing Number

572/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

99/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvaiyaru

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 18-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

12

Police Station

Naducauvery Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b), 115(2), 118(A), 351(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M Guru

    Adv. MEKALA A

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Naducavery Police Station

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate Court in Tiruvarur granted a relaxation of bail conditions to the 34-year-old petitioner, allowing him to report to the police station on Mondays and Fridays at 10:00 AM instead of the stricter previously ordered schedule. The court considered the petitioner's compliance with existing bail conditions, the pending status of the case, and his livelihood concerns while rejecting the prosecution's objection to the relaxation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  7. 04-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 99/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate Court in Tiruvarur granted a relaxation of bail conditions to the 34-year-old petitioner, allowing him to report to the police station on Mondays and Fridays at 10:00 AM instead of the stricter previously ordered schedule. The court considered the petitioner's compliance with existing bail conditions, the pending status of the case, and his livelihood concerns while rejecting the prosecution's objection to the relaxation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case