SI of police,NDC P.S,in CC.139-2011 split up CC. vs A6.Ravi — 3/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148.,294(b),,323,324,506(ii). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 13th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTJ160001952024
Filing Number
195/2024
Filing Date
14-09-2011
Registration No
3/2024
Registration Date
14-09-2011
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvaiyaru
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
161
Police Station
Naducauvery Police Station
Year
2009
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI of police,NDC P.S,in CC.139-2011 split up CC.
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
A6.Ravi
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 03-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 20-02-2026 | Judgement |
| 11-02-2026 | Judgement |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Thiruvaiyaru acquitted the accused (Ravi, age 63) of charges under IPC sections 148 (rioting), 294(b) (obscene words), 324 (causing hurt with weapon), and 506(ii) (criminal intimidation). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused participated in the alleged incident of June 9, 2009, where the complainant was assaulted with a sickle and threatened. The court noted inconsistencies in witness testimonies and lack of direct evidence linking the accused to the crime, resulting in an acquittal and release of the bail bonds furnished. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Thiruvaiyaru acquitted the accused (Ravi, age 63) of charges under IPC sections 148 (rioting), 294(b) (obscene words), 324 (causing hurt with weapon), and 506(ii) (criminal intimidation). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused participated in the alleged incident of June 9, 2009, where the complainant was assaulted with a sickle and threatened. The court noted inconsistencies in witness testimonies and lack of direct evidence linking the accused to the crime, resulting in an acquittal and release of the bail bonds furnished. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts