the Inspector of Police vs Madhavan — 200060/2016
Status: Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant. Next hearing: 29th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTJ160000032016
Next Hearing
29th May 2026
Filing Number
200060/2016
Filing Date
13-07-2016
Registration No
200060/2016
Registration Date
13-07-2016
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvaiyaru
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate
FIR Details
FIR Number
73
Police Station
Thirukattupalli Police Station
Year
2016
Petitioner(s)
the Inspector of Police
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Madhavan
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
| 25-03-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
| 11-03-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
| 25-02-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
| 04-02-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
Interim Orders
Case Summary CC No. 60/2016 | Tiruvaiyaru Judicial Magistrate Court On 23 October 2025, the testimony of prosecution witness PW-8 (a retired police assistant inspector) was recorded under Section 54(9) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969. The witness testified regarding FIR No. 124/2016 registered under IPC Sections 419 and 420 based on a complaint about alleged fake jewelry and fraudulent address. The cross-examination of the witness proceeded, and the court admitted the evidence after the witness affirmed its accuracy. The case continues with proceedings under CrPC Section 317. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary CC No. 60/2016 | Tiruvaiyaru Judicial Magistrate Court On 23 October 2025, the testimony of prosecution witness PW-8 (a retired police assistant inspector) was recorded under Section 54(9) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969. The witness testified regarding FIR No. 124/2016 registered under IPC Sections 419 and 420 based on a complaint about alleged fake jewelry and fraudulent address. The cross-examination of the witness proceeded, and the court admitted the evidence after the witness affirmed its accuracy. The case continues with proceedings under CrPC Section 317. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts