Inspector of police vs Jayaraman and 2 others Advocate - R.M. Raj, M.A., B.L., — 200131/2010
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 197,198,466,468,120. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 30th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTJ160000032010
Filing Number
200131/2010
Filing Date
18-08-2010
Registration No
200131/2010
Registration Date
09-09-2010
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvaiyaru
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
213
Police Station
Thiruvaiyaru Police Station
Year
2008
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of police
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Jayaraman and 2 others Advocate - R.M. Raj, M.A., B.L.,
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Judgement
Framing of Charges
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 28-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 25-03-2026 | Framing of Charges |
| 23-03-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 16-03-2026 | For further Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Judgment Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Thiruvaiyaru acquitted two village administrative officers (accused 1 and 2) of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 197, 468, and 120B. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused conspired with a third party to create forged revenue documents regarding a disputed agricultural property, as the key evidence and documents were not properly presented or verified during investigation. The case against the third accused was abated due to his death. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Judgment Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Thiruvaiyaru acquitted two village administrative officers (accused 1 and 2) of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 197, 468, and 120B. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused conspired with a third party to create forged revenue documents regarding a disputed agricultural property, as the key evidence and documents were not properly presented or verified during investigation. The case against the third accused was abated due to his death. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts