M. Balamurugan vs R. Chezhiyan Advocate - A. Chithiraichelvan B.Com. B.L. — 135/2025

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section U/Sec 27(c). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.

Trial Next hearing 30-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTJ150001492025

Filing Number

154/2025

Filing Date

18-Jul-2025

Registration No

135/2025

Registration Date

18-Jul-2025

Court

District Munsif Court, Thiruvaiyaru

Judge

1-District Munsif

Last updated 18-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Court Fees Act, 1870 Section U/Sec 27(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M. Balamurugan

    Adv. S. Jothivel M.A. B.L.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.R. Chezhiyan Advocate - A. Chithiraichelvan B.Com. B.L.

Case History

  1. 30-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary Case: I.A.No.339 of 2025 in O.S.No.135 of 2025 | District Court, Tiruvaiyaru | March 26, 2026 Outcome: Petition DISMISSED. The court rejected the plaintiff's request for temporary injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's possession and enjoyment of the property. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish the three essential conditions required for granting interim relief: (1) a prima facie case, (2) balance of convenience in plaintiff's favor, and (3) irreparable loss if relief is not granted. Notably, the plaintiff could not provide documentary evidence proving continuous possession of the land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 26-Mar-2026

    Issues

    District Munsif

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Issues

    District Munsif

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Issues

    District Munsif

  8. 05-Mar-2026

    Issues

    District Munsif

  9. 05-Jan-2026

    Issues

    District Munsif

  10. 14-Nov-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  11. 11-Nov-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  12. 15-Sep-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  13. 14-Aug-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  14. 18-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  15. 18-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 135/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case: I.A.No.339 of 2025 in O.S.No.135 of 2025 | District Court, Tiruvaiyaru | March 26, 2026 Outcome: Petition DISMISSED. The court rejected the plaintiff's request for temporary injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's possession and enjoyment of the property. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish the three essential conditions required for granting interim relief: (1) a prima facie case, (2) balance of convenience in plaintiff's favor, and (3) irreparable loss if relief is not granted. Notably, the plaintiff could not provide documentary evidence proving continuous possession of the land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case