Rajas vs Shiek Allavudeen Advocate - K. Vaithiyalingam B.A. B.L. — 100154/2014
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 27(c). Disposed: Contested--Decreed without cost on 15th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNTJ150000532014
Filing Number
100154/2014
Filing Date
21-08-2014
Registration No
100154/2014
Registration Date
21-08-2014
Court
District Munsif Court, Thiruvaiyaru
Judge
1-District Munsif
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed without cost
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajas
Adv. S. Viswanathan B.Sc., B.L.,
Respondent(s)
Shiek Allavudeen Advocate - K. Vaithiyalingam B.A. B.L.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 07-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 01-04-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Summary The District Court of Thiruvaiyaru granted a permanent injunction in favor of the plaintiff (M. Ramesh) against the defendants (Harat Habib Shah Qadiri Dargah). The court found that the plaintiff, as a tenant cultivator, has legitimate possession and cultivation rights over the disputed agricultural land (tava) inherited from his father, who obtained sub-lease rights from the original leaseholder. The court decreed that the defendants are permanently restrained from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful enjoyment and cultivation of the property through any unlawful means, while permitting the Waqf Board to pursue legal remedies through proper procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Summary The District Court of Thiruvaiyaru granted a permanent injunction in favor of the plaintiff (M. Ramesh) against the defendants (Harat Habib Shah Qadiri Dargah). The court found that the plaintiff, as a tenant cultivator, has legitimate possession and cultivation rights over the disputed agricultural land (tava) inherited from his father, who obtained sub-lease rights from the original leaseholder. The court decreed that the defendants are permanently restrained from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful enjoyment and cultivation of the property through any unlawful means, while permitting the Waqf Board to pursue legal remedies through proper procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts