Selvaraj vs Appadurai Advocate - T.A. Punithan, M.A., B.L., R1 to R — 13/2021
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section Or 21 R 11. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
EP - Execution Petition
CNR: TNTJ150000502021
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
Filing Number
68/2021
Filing Date
11-03-2021
Registration No
13/2021
Registration Date
10-08-2021
Court
District Munsif Court, Thiruvaiyaru
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Selvaraj
Adv. S.Viswanathan, B.Sc., B.L.,
Padmavathi
Respondent(s)
Appadurai Advocate - T.A. Punithan, M.A., B.L., R1 to R
A. Udhayakumar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 22-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 17-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 01-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
This is a witness deposition document from District Munsif Court, Thiruvaiyaru (Case E.P. No. 13/2021), where witness Udhayakumar (age 53) was examined on April 22, 2026 under the Oaths Act, 1969. The witness testified regarding defendant No. 1's alleged wrongdoing and submitted five documentary exhibits (land records, official certifications, and survey documents) as evidence. The deposition was recorded in open court, read over to the witness who confirmed its accuracy, and cross-examination by the defendant's counsel was postponed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a witness deposition document from District Munsif Court, Thiruvaiyaru (Case E.P. No. 13/2021), where witness Udhayakumar (age 53) was examined on April 22, 2026 under the Oaths Act, 1969. The witness testified regarding defendant No. 1's alleged wrongdoing and submitted five documentary exhibits (land records, official certifications, and survey documents) as evidence. The deposition was recorded in open court, read over to the witness who confirmed its accuracy, and cross-examination by the defendant's counsel was postponed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts