Madukkur PS vs Ibraheem Lodi @ Mohamed Ibraheem Advocate - N. Nithiyanantham., B.A., B.L., — 400391/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,341,294(b),336,153(A),506(i). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 16th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTJ110019452017
Filing Number
400391/2017
Filing Date
13-Dec-2017
Registration No
400391/2017
Registration Date
13-Dec-2017
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Pattukottai
Judge
4-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 19-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
249
Police Station
Madukkur Police Station
Year
2010
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Madukkur PS (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ibraheem Lodi @ Mohamed Ibraheem Advocate - N. Nithiyanantham., B.A., B.L.,
-
2.Awrangasheep
-
3.Raja Mohamed
-
4.Shyed(Absconding)
-
5.Liyal Ahamed(Absconding)
-
6.Parakkavetti Shagul @ shagul Ameethu
-
7.Haja Moideen
-
8.Sulthan @ Mohamed sulthan
-
9.Abdull Hakeem
-
10.Jabarullah
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Court Decision Summary Case: CC-391/2017 (Madurai Judicial Magistrate Court, Tamil Nadu) Decision: The court acquitted all eight accused persons of charges under IPC sections 147, 294(b), 336, 153(A), and 506(1), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The judge noted that the key witness (PW1) gave contradictory testimony—initially denying knowledge of the incident during police investigation but later testifying for the accused—which undermined the credibility of the prosecution's case and rendered the evidence insufficient to sustain a conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Mar-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Mar-2026
Deposition of witnessView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
Deposition of witnessView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Feb-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Feb-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Feb-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Jan-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Jan-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Dec-2025
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Nov-2025
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Nov-2025
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Nov-2025
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Nov-2025
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Oct-2025
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Sep-2025
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Sep-2025
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Aug-2025
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Jul-2025
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Jul-2025
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Jun-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Jun-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-May-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
14-May-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
13-May-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Feb-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Jan-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Jan-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Jan-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Dec-2024
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Nov-2024
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Nov-2024
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Oct-2024
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Oct-2024
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Oct-2024
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Oct-2024
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Sep-2024
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Sep-2024
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Sep-2024
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Sep-2024
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Aug-2024
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Aug-2024
Copies
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Aug-2024
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Jul-2024
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Jul-2024
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Jul-2024
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Jul-2024
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Jul-2024
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Jun-2024
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Jun-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Jun-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Jun-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Jun-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-May-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Mar-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Feb-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Jan-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Dec-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Oct-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Sep-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Jul-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-May-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Mar-2023
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Feb-2023
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Jan-2023
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Nov-2022
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Sep-2022
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Jul-2022
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-May-2022
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Apr-2022
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Feb-2022
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Nov-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Sep-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Sep-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Jul-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Jun-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Mar-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Mar-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Feb-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Dec-2020
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Nov-2020
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Sep-2020
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Jun-2020
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-May-2020
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Apr-2020
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Mar-2020
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Mar-2020
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Feb-2020
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Feb-2020
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Jan-2020
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Dec-2019
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Dec-2019
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Nov-2019
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Oct-2019
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Sep-2019
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Aug-2019
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Aug-2019
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Jul-2019
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Jun-2019
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Jun-2019
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-May-2019
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Mar-2019
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Jan-2019
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Nov-2018
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Sep-2018
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Aug-2018
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Jul-2018
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Jun-2018
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
08-May-2018
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Mar-2018
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Mar-2018
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Jan-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Dec-2017
Case filed
Registration No. 400391/2017
Court Decision Summary Case: CC-391/2017 (Madurai Judicial Magistrate Court, Tamil Nadu) Decision: The court acquitted all eight accused persons of charges under IPC sections 147, 294(b), 336, 153(A), and 506(1), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The judge noted that the key witness (PW1) gave contradictory testimony—initially denying knowledge of the incident during police investigation but later testifying for the accused—which undermined the credibility of the prosecution's case and rendered the evidence insufficient to sustain a conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts