Inspector of Police vs Ananthakumar — 400132/2015
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 342,324. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 13th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTJ110003152015
Filing Number
132/2015
Filing Date
24-Apr-2015
Registration No
400132/2015
Registration Date
24-Apr-2015
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Pattukottai
Judge
4-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 19-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
252
Police Station
Pattukkottai Taluka Police Station
Year
2013
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Inspector of Police
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ananthakumar
-
2.Arivalagan
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: CC-132/2015 The court acquitted two accused persons (Anantha Kumar and Arivazhan) charged under IPC sections 324 and 342 for allegedly assaulting a witness and causing injuries. The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, noting that key prosecution witnesses gave contradictory statements—initially supporting the case during police investigation but later testifying opposite during trial. The court relied only on the investigating officer's testimony, which was insufficient to establish guilt, and therefore granted acquittal under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Mar-2026
Judgement
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Mar-2026
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Mar-2026
Deposition of witnessView PDF
-
03-Mar-2026
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Feb-2026
Deposition of witnessView PDF
-
26-Feb-2026
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Feb-2026
Deposition of witnessView PDF
-
24-Feb-2026
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Feb-2026
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Jan-2026
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Jan-2026
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Dec-2025
Deposition of witnessView PDF
-
18-Dec-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Dec-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Dec-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Nov-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Nov-2025
Deposition of witnessView PDF
-
11-Nov-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Oct-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Sep-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Sep-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Sep-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Aug-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Aug-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Jul-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Jul-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-May-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Mar-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Mar-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Jan-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Dec-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Oct-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Sep-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Aug-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Aug-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Jul-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Jun-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Jun-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-May-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
22-May-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-May-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Apr-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Mar-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Mar-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Feb-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Jan-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Dec-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Nov-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Oct-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Oct-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Sep-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Jul-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-May-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Mar-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Jan-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Nov-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Oct-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Sep-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Jul-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-May-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Apr-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Jan-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Nov-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Aug-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Jun-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-May-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Mar-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Feb-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Dec-2020
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Sep-2020
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Jul-2020
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-May-2020
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Apr-2020
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Mar-2020
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Feb-2020
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Jan-2020
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Dec-2019
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Nov-2019
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Oct-2019
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Sep-2019
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Jul-2019
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
14-May-2019
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Apr-2019
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Apr-2019
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Feb-2019
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Jan-2019
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Jan-2019
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Dec-2018
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Nov-2018
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Aug-2018
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Jul-2018
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-May-2018
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Mar-2018
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Dec-2017
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Oct-2017
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Sep-2017
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Jul-2017
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Jun-2017
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-May-2017
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Mar-2017
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Feb-2017
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Jan-2017
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Nov-2016
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Sep-2016
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Jul-2016
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Jun-2016
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Apr-2016
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Feb-2016
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Nov-2015
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Oct-2015
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Oct-2015
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Jul-2015
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-May-2015
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Apr-2015
Case filed
Registration No. 400132/2015
Case Summary: CC-132/2015 The court acquitted two accused persons (Anantha Kumar and Arivazhan) charged under IPC sections 324 and 342 for allegedly assaulting a witness and causing injuries. The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, noting that key prosecution witnesses gave contradictory statements—initially supporting the case during police investigation but later testifying opposite during trial. The court relied only on the investigating officer's testimony, which was insufficient to establish guilt, and therefore granted acquittal under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts