Madukkur Police Station vs Bose @ Kubendran — 10/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,341,294(b)336,506(i),153. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 16th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTJ110000402021
Filing Number
37/2021
Filing Date
03-Mar-2021
Registration No
10/2021
Registration Date
03-Mar-2021
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Pattukottai
Judge
4-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 19-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
250
Police Station
Madukkur Police Station
Year
2010
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Madukkur Police Station
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Bose @ Kubendran
-
2.Senguttuvan
-
3.Suresh
-
4.Sanmugam
-
5.Pazhanivel
-
6.Rasappa
-
7.Ragupathi
-
8.Prapakaran
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Pattukkottai acquitted all four accused persons (C.P. Bose, Sanmugam, Raasappa, and Prabharanandan) under Sections 147, 294(b), 336, 153(A), and 506(1) IPC by invoking Section 248(1) CrPC. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, primarily because the key witness (victim) gave contradictory statements—first telling police she did not recognize the perpetrators, then later implicating them during examination-in-chief, rendering the testimony unreliable and insufficient to establish guilt against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Mar-2026
Deposition of witnessView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Jan-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Jan-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Oct-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Sep-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Sep-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Jul-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Jul-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Jul-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-May-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
14-May-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Feb-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Jan-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Jan-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Jan-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Dec-2024
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Nov-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Nov-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Oct-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Oct-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Oct-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Oct-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Sep-2024
Deposition of witnessView PDF
-
25-Sep-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Sep-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Sep-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Sep-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Sep-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Sep-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Aug-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Aug-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Aug-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Jul-2024
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Jul-2024
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Jul-2024
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Jul-2024
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Jul-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-May-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Mar-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Feb-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Jan-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Dec-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Oct-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Sep-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Jul-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-May-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Mar-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Jan-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Dec-2022
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Nov-2022
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Nov-2022
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Sep-2022
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Sep-2022
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Sep-2022
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Aug-2022
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Jul-2022
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Jul-2022
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-May-2022
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Apr-2022
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Apr-2022
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Feb-2022
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Nov-2021
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Oct-2021
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Aug-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Jun-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Mar-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Mar-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 10/2021
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Pattukkottai acquitted all four accused persons (C.P. Bose, Sanmugam, Raasappa, and Prabharanandan) under Sections 147, 294(b), 336, 153(A), and 506(1) IPC by invoking Section 248(1) CrPC. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, primarily because the key witness (victim) gave contradictory statements—first telling police she did not recognize the perpetrators, then later implicating them during examination-in-chief, rendering the testimony unreliable and insufficient to establish guilt against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts