Ramasamy vs Thandayuthapani Advocate - N.Palusamy — 263/2022
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O 7 Rule 1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTJ100003162022
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
339/2022
Filing Date
21-11-2022
Registration No
263/2022
Registration Date
14-12-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Pattukottai
Judge
3-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramasamy
Adv. S.J.Subashini
Respondent(s)
Thandayuthapani Advocate - N.Palusamy
Viravasundaram
Adv. Exparte
Ganesan
Vairamuthu
Nadarajan
Adv. N.Palusamy
Manickam
Swaminathan
Sathiyamoorthy
Adv. N.Palusamy
Amutha
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Munsif
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 03-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This is a Tamil language court order from the District Munsif Court in Pattukkottai dated 11.03.2026, concerning Original Case No. 263/2022 involving property disputes over agricultural land (plot 30/2). The court examined the plaintiff's claims regarding ownership and deeds of various land parcels, noting discrepancies between the claimed property extent (16.5 cents) and the actual deeded portion (8.5 cents in plot 30/2 and additional parcels in 30/2C2). The case was adjourned with cross-examination of the defendant continuing, and the court's examination of witness statements regarding historical property transactions and boundaries was recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a Tamil language court order from the District Munsif Court in Pattukkottai dated 11.03.2026, concerning Original Case No. 263/2022 involving property disputes over agricultural land (plot 30/2). The court examined the plaintiff's claims regarding ownership and deeds of various land parcels, noting discrepancies between the claimed property extent (16.5 cents) and the actual deeded portion (8.5 cents in plot 30/2 and additional parcels in 30/2C2). The case was adjourned with cross-examination of the defendant continuing, and the court's examination of witness statements regarding historical property transactions and boundaries was recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts