Mariyam Jabeera rep by its Power Agent Ahamed Kabir vs Mohamed Ethris Advocate - Pandi Thennavan — 164/2022
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 27(c),25(d). Status: Enquiry. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTJ100001922022
Next Hearing
15th July 2026
Filing Number
209/2022
Filing Date
28-06-2022
Registration No
164/2022
Registration Date
22-07-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Pattukottai
Judge
3-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mariyam Jabeera rep by its Power Agent Ahamed Kabir
Adv. Thiru.B.Ashokkumar
Respondent(s)
Mohamed Ethris Advocate - Pandi Thennavan
Ummal Habeepa
Adv. Pandi Thennavan
Subregistar, Athirampattinam
Adv. GP
The District Collector, Thanjavur
Adv. GP
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Munsif
Enquiry
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Enquiry |
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 28-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Court Order from District Munsif, Pattukkottai (Case No. 164/2022, dated 18.07.2023) The court recorded cross-examination testimony of the plaintiff's witness regarding a property dispute involving a Hiba (gift deed) document dated 24.09.1981 and conflicting property documents from 1990 and 2005. The court ordered that the cross-examination of defendants 1 and 2 be postponed/adjourned to allow further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Court Order from District Munsif, Pattukkottai (Case No. 164/2022, dated 18.07.2023) The court recorded cross-examination testimony of the plaintiff's witness regarding a property dispute involving a Hiba (gift deed) document dated 24.09.1981 and conflicting property documents from 1990 and 2005. The court ordered that the cross-examination of defendants 1 and 2 be postponed/adjourned to allow further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts