Indirajith vs Pugalanthi Advocate - G.Senkodi — 89/2019
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 27(c). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTJ100001692019
Next Hearing
15th July 2026
Filing Number
197/2019
Filing Date
11-07-2019
Registration No
89/2019
Registration Date
11-07-2019
Court
District Munsif Court, Pattukottai
Judge
3-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Indirajith
Adv. P.Lenin
Respondent(s)
Pugalanthi Advocate - G.Senkodi
Thirumehan
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Munsif
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Counter
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 01-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 11-03-2026 | Counter |
| 03-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 09-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Petition Allowed. The District Civil Court at Pattukkottai permitted the petitioner/plaintiff to file a revision petition under CPC Order 6 Rule 17 against the original case (Original Case No. 89/2019) to challenge a permanent injunction order previously granted against him. The court found that certain property-related issues regarding a settlement deed and the plaintiff's rights over the property required further examination in the original suit, and therefore allowed the revision petition to proceed with the case inquiry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Petition Allowed. The District Civil Court at Pattukkottai permitted the petitioner/plaintiff to file a revision petition under CPC Order 6 Rule 17 against the original case (Original Case No. 89/2019) to challenge a permanent injunction order previously granted against him. The court found that certain property-related issues regarding a settlement deed and the plaintiff's rights over the property required further examination in the original suit, and therefore allowed the revision petition to proceed with the case inquiry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts