P. Mariyappan vs State Government Advocate - K.Karthikeyan — 300039/2016
Case under Civildefenceact Section 27(c)ofTNCFAct. Disposed: Contested--Decreed without cost on 28th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNTJ100000532016
Filing Number
300039/2016
Filing Date
10-03-2016
Registration No
300039/2016
Registration Date
10-03-2016
Court
District Munsif Court, Pattukottai
Judge
3-District Munsif
Decision Date
28th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed without cost
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P. Mariyappan
Adv. N.Usha
Respondent(s)
State Government Advocate - K.Karthikeyan
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Munsif
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Judgment Summary The District Munsif Court in Pattukkottai ruled that a private individual (6th defendant) illegally collected substantial amounts using a temple's name, photographs, deity images, and invitations without proper authorization. While temporary shelters for public welfare during festivals are permissible if properly authorized through resolutions, the court granted permanent injunctions prohibiting the 6th defendant and any private individuals from collecting money by misusing the temple's name or associated materials. The suit was decreed partially in the plaintiff's favor without costs, establishing that unauthorized private fundraising using temple identity is unlawful, though legitimately-authorized public welfare structures remain permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Judgment Summary The District Munsif Court in Pattukkottai ruled that a private individual (6th defendant) illegally collected substantial amounts using a temple's name, photographs, deity images, and invitations without proper authorization. While temporary shelters for public welfare during festivals are permissible if properly authorized through resolutions, the court granted permanent injunctions prohibiting the 6th defendant and any private individuals from collecting money by misusing the temple's name or associated materials. The suit was decreed partially in the plaintiff's favor without costs, establishing that unauthorized private fundraising using temple identity is unlawful, though legitimately-authorized public welfare structures remain permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts