PA MU A VEE Seetha Trust Pattukottai Rep by its the Managing Trustee DThangavel vs Nadimuthu — 6/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 7 Rule 1. Disposed: Contested--Terminated on 15th April 2026.
EP - Execution Petition
CNR: TNTJ100000122026
e-Filing Number
12-01-2026
Filing Number
13/2026
Filing Date
12-Jan-2026
Registration No
6/2026
Registration Date
21-Jan-2026
Court
District Munsif Court, Pattukottai
Judge
3-District Munsif
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Terminated
Last updated 19-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PA MU A VEE Seetha Trust Pattukottai Rep by its the Managing Trustee DThangavel
Adv. Jeyaveerapandiyan R
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nadimuthu
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The District Munsif Court terminated the Execution Petition filed by PA MU A VEE Seetha Trust to recover vacant possession of property from the judgment debtor R. Nadimuthu, as possession had already been delivered on 25.03.2026. Although the Rent Tribunal subsequently granted a stay on the execution proceedings, the court found it infructuous since delivery of the property had already occurred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Disposed
District Munsif
-
10-Apr-2026
Batta
District Munsif
-
30-Mar-2026
Batta
District Munsif
-
23-Mar-2026
Batta
District Munsif
-
11-Mar-2026
Batta
District Munsif
-
07-Mar-2026
Enquiry
District Munsif
-
04-Mar-2026
Counter
District Munsif
-
02-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
District Munsif
-
23-Feb-2026
Issue of Service
District Munsif
-
21-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 6/2026
The District Munsif Court terminated the Execution Petition filed by PA MU A VEE Seetha Trust to recover vacant possession of property from the judgment debtor R. Nadimuthu, as possession had already been delivered on 25.03.2026. Although the Rent Tribunal subsequently granted a stay on the execution proceedings, the court found it infructuous since delivery of the property had already occurred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts