State Government west ps vs PADHAMAVATHI — 672/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,506(2) IPC. Disposed: Contested--Conviction on 06th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTJ050024082025
e-Filing Number
28-05-2025
Filing Number
2380/2025
Filing Date
13-06-2025
Registration No
672/2025
Registration Date
21-08-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Courts, Thanjavur
Judge
7-Judicial Magistrate No.I
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Conviction
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government west ps (Police Station)
Adv. Inspector of Police Tan West PS
Respondent(s)
PADHAMAVATHI
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Judicial Magistrate No.I
Disposed
Judgement
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-05-2026 | Judgement |
| 24-04-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
| 07-04-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
| 18-03-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
Interim Orders
This document is a witness deposition (not a final court judgment) in Thanjavur Judicial Magistrate Court, Case No. 672/2025, involving charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 323, and 506(ii). The investigating officer testifies about filing an FIR on 29.03.2024 following a complaint, conducting site inspections and witness interviews, and submitting a final report on 10.03.2025 recommending prosecution of the three accused. The cross-examination challenges the thoroughness of the investigation and the credibility of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a witness deposition (not a final court judgment) in Thanjavur Judicial Magistrate Court, Case No. 672/2025, involving charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 323, and 506(ii). The investigating officer testifies about filing an FIR on 29.03.2024 following a complaint, conducting site inspections and witness interviews, and submitting a final report on 10.03.2025 recommending prosecution of the three accused. The cross-examination challenges the thoroughness of the investigation and the credibility of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts