Sharukkhan sathik basha vs State Government — 180/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503(2). Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTJ050010592026

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

1028/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

180/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Courts, Thanjavur

Judge

7-Judicial Magistrate No.I

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 19-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

87

Police Station

Thanjavur South Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sharukkhan sathik basha

    Adv. Ajith jayaraj

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of bail OrderView PDF

    The Thanjavur Judicial Magistrate Court granted the petitioner's petition for interim custody of a seized THAR vehicle (TN 45 CE 0033), allowing its return subject to conditions including execution of a ₹10 lakh bond with two sureties, preparation of panchanama with photographs, and an affidavit undertaking not to alienate or alter the property until case disposal. The court relied on Supreme Court guidelines to balance the petitioner's ownership rights against the criminal proceedings involving offenses under BNS sections 308(4) and 351(2). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 180/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Thanjavur Judicial Magistrate Court granted the petitioner's petition for interim custody of a seized THAR vehicle (TN 45 CE 0033), allowing its return subject to conditions including execution of a ₹10 lakh bond with two sureties, preparation of panchanama with photographs, and an affidavit undertaking not to alienate or alter the property until case disposal. The court relied on Supreme Court guidelines to balance the petitioner's ownership rights against the criminal proceedings involving offenses under BNS sections 308(4) and 351(2). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case