Maheshkumar vs State Government by Sub Inspector of South PS — 153/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTJ050010132026
e-Filing Number
26-02-2026
Filing Number
984/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
153/2026
Registration Date
26-02-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Courts, Thanjavur
Judge
7-Judicial Magistrate No.I
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
320
Police Station
Thanjavur South Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Maheshkumar
Adv. SATHYA MATHIVANAN
Respondent(s)
State Government by Sub Inspector of South PS (Police Station)
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Judicial Magistrate No.I
Disposed
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 10-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 07-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 06-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Thanjavur Judicial Magistrate allowed Mahesh Kumar's petition to obtain interim custody of an IMOU IP Camera seized by police in a case under Section 305(a) BNS. The court granted the property's return on conditions including execution of a ₹50,000 bond with surety, preparation of panchanama with photographs, and an affidavit undertaking not to alienate or alter the property until case disposal. The petitioner must produce the property whenever required by the court and at trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Thanjavur Judicial Magistrate allowed Mahesh Kumar's petition to obtain interim custody of an IMOU IP Camera seized by police in a case under Section 305(a) BNS. The court granted the property's return on conditions including execution of a ₹50,000 bond with surety, preparation of panchanama with photographs, and an affidavit undertaking not to alienate or alter the property until case disposal. The petitioner must produce the property whenever required by the court and at trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts