Maheshkumar vs State Government by Sub Inspector of South PS — 153/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTJ050010132026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

26-02-2026

Filing Number

984/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

153/2026

Registration Date

26-02-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Courts, Thanjavur

Judge

7-Judicial Magistrate No.I

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

320

Police Station

Thanjavur South Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503

Petitioner(s)

Maheshkumar

Adv. SATHYA MATHIVANAN

Respondent(s)

State Government by Sub Inspector of South PS (Police Station)

Hearing History

Judge: 7-Judicial Magistrate No.I

12-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Issue of Service

10-03-2026

Issue of Service

07-03-2026

Issue of Service

06-03-2026

Issue of Service

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Copy of bail Order

Summary: The Thanjavur Judicial Magistrate allowed Mahesh Kumar's petition to obtain interim custody of an IMOU IP Camera seized by police in a case under Section 305(a) BNS. The court granted the property's return on conditions including execution of a ₹50,000 bond with surety, preparation of panchanama with photographs, and an affidavit undertaking not to alienate or alter the property until case disposal. The petitioner must produce the property whenever required by the court and at trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Thanjavur Judicial Magistrate allowed Mahesh Kumar's petition to obtain interim custody of an IMOU IP Camera seized by police in a case under Section 305(a) BNS. The court granted the property's return on conditions including execution of a ₹50,000 bond with surety, preparation of panchanama with photographs, and an affidavit undertaking not to alienate or alter the property until case disposal. The petitioner must produce the property whenever required by the court and at trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Courts, Thanjavur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case