State Government(Legal Heir) vs Arulraj, sivakumar — 176/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223. Status: Issue of Process. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTJ050010072026
e-Filing Number
25-02-2026
Filing Number
978/2026
Filing Date
25-Feb-2026
Registration No
176/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Courts, Thanjavur
Judge
7-Judicial Magistrate No.I
Last updated 19-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Government(Legal Heir)
Adv. RAJMOHAN G
Respondent(s)
-
1.Arulraj, sivakumar
Case History
-
02-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-May-2026
Issue of Process
Judicial Magistrate No.I
-
04-May-2026
Deposition of WitnessView PDF
Summary This is a Tamil court order (CRMP No. 176/2026, dated 04.05.2026) regarding a civil revision petition. The petitioner sought enforcement of a Consumer Court judgment that ordered the Taluk Office to issue a compensatory certificate (pattas) within two weeks and pay compensation of ₹3,000 and ₹2,000 in case costs. The court recorded the petitioner's sworn statement detailing administrative delays and inaction by officials despite the judgment, and completed cross-examination of witnesses. The case appears to be in the final hearing stage with the court examining evidence related to non-implementation of the earlier judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Issue of Process
Judicial Magistrate No.I
-
15-Apr-2026
Issue of Process
Judicial Magistrate No.I
-
01-Apr-2026
Issue of Process
Judicial Magistrate No.I
-
17-Mar-2026
Issue of Process
Judicial Magistrate No.I
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 176/2026
Summary This is a Tamil court order (CRMP No. 176/2026, dated 04.05.2026) regarding a civil revision petition. The petitioner sought enforcement of a Consumer Court judgment that ordered the Taluk Office to issue a compensatory certificate (pattas) within two weeks and pay compensation of ₹3,000 and ₹2,000 in case costs. The court recorded the petitioner's sworn statement detailing administrative delays and inaction by officials despite the judgment, and completed cross-examination of witnesses. The case appears to be in the final hearing stage with the court examining evidence related to non-implementation of the earlier judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts