State Government SI of Police, East Ps, Thanjavur vs Arun and Seven others — 700018/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 7(1)(a)CLAAC. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 24th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTJ050000692017
Filing Number
700018/2017
Filing Date
30-01-2017
Registration No
700018/2017
Registration Date
30-01-2017
Court
Judicial Magistrate Courts, Thanjavur
Judge
7-Judicial Magistrate No.I
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
488/2015
Police Station
Thanjavur East Police Station
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government SI of Police, East Ps (Police Station), Thanjavur
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Arun and Seven others
Raja Alias Briyani Raja
Dhinesh Alias Kolukkattai Dhinesh
Vickly Alias Vignesh(Absconding)
Sathiyaraj
Murugan
City Mani Alias Tamil Selvan
Mohamed Arif
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Judicial Magistrate No.I
Disposed
Judgement
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 17-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Tanjore District Court acquitted defendants 2 and 5 of charges under Section 151 Cr.Pc r/w 7(1)(a) CLA Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt based solely on police officer testimony without corroborating eyewitness evidence. The court ruled that while police witnesses testified about an alleged incident on December 1, 2015, the absence of any private witnesses from a populated area created reasonable doubt, and therefore benefit of doubt was given to the accused under Criminal Procedure Code Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Tanjore District Court acquitted defendants 2 and 5 of charges under Section 151 Cr.Pc r/w 7(1)(a) CLA Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt based solely on police officer testimony without corroborating eyewitness evidence. The court ruled that while police witnesses testified about an alleged incident on December 1, 2015, the absence of any private witnesses from a populated area created reasonable doubt, and therefore benefit of doubt was given to the accused under Criminal Procedure Code Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts