State Government by the Inspector of Police, Thanjavur South Police Station vs Bhuvaneshwaran — 344/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,450,302r/w114,146,326,506(2). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 16th March 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNTJ010143372024
Filing Number
10176/2024
Filing Date
20-12-2024
Registration No
344/2024
Registration Date
20-12-2024
Court
Principal District Court, Thanjavur
Judge
1-Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
600
Police Station
Thanjavur South Police Station
Year
1998
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government by the Inspector of Police, Thanjavur South Police Station
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Bhuvaneshwaran
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 06-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal Sessions Judge of Thanjavur acquitted Bhuvaneswaran (8th accused) of charges including rioting with dangerous weapons, abetment of murder, attempted murder, and causing grievous injury, finding insufficient evidence to prove his guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that while co-accused in related cases were acquitted and eyewitnesses turned hostile, the evidence against the accused was inseparable and indivisible from that against his co-accused, warranting his acquittal under the established legal principle that remaining accused cannot be treated differently when evidence is shared. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal Sessions Judge of Thanjavur acquitted Bhuvaneswaran (8th accused) of charges including rioting with dangerous weapons, abetment of murder, attempted murder, and causing grievous injury, finding insufficient evidence to prove his guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that while co-accused in related cases were acquitted and eyewitnesses turned hostile, the evidence against the accused was inseparable and indivisible from that against his co-accused, warranting his acquittal under the established legal principle that remaining accused cannot be treated differently when evidence is shared. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts