State Government rep by the Inspector of Police, Thirukkattupalli Police Station vs Ranjithkumar Advocate - C.Saravanan — 309/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b), 307, 326. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 02nd April 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNTJ010139092024
Filing Number
9878/2024
Filing Date
09-12-2024
Registration No
309/2024
Registration Date
09-12-2024
Court
Principal District Court, Thanjavur
Judge
1-Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
232
Police Station
Thirukattupalli Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government rep by the Inspector of Police, Thirukkattupalli Police Station
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Ranjithkumar Advocate - C.Saravanan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Arguments
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 16-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 04-03-2026 | Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Thanjavur, acquitted Ranjith Kumar of charges under IPC sections 294(b) (abusive language) and 307 (attempt to murder), finding that the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that key witnesses—including the victim and complainant—turned hostile and provided no reliable evidence connecting the accused to the alleged stabbing incident on May 21, 2024, and that remaining witnesses were only police officials testifying to procedural matters, not substantive facts of the crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Thanjavur, acquitted Ranjith Kumar of charges under IPC sections 294(b) (abusive language) and 307 (attempt to murder), finding that the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that key witnesses—including the victim and complainant—turned hostile and provided no reliable evidence connecting the accused to the alleged stabbing incident on May 21, 2024, and that remaining witnesses were only police officials testifying to procedural matters, not substantive facts of the crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts