Jothimain.P vs Rajeswari. E Advocate - R.M.Raj — 6333/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 432(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 28th April 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTJ010100172024

Filing Number

7131/2024

Filing Date

30-Aug-2024

Registration No

6333/2024

Registration Date

30-Aug-2024

Court

Principal District Court, Thanjavur

Judge

1-Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

Decision Date

28-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 19-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 432(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jothimain.P

    Adv. Parthiban. K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rajeswari. E Advocate - R.M.Raj

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Thanjavur, allowed the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition and permitted the accused (Jothimani) to mark a certified copy of a registered sale deed dated 17.10.2018 (Document No. 6045/2018) as additional evidence in his appeal. The court found the registered sale deed to be relevant and material evidence necessary for just adjudication of the cheque dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, particularly regarding the nature of the transaction and existence of legally enforceable liability. The document was admitted as Ex.D1 despite the complainant's objections that it was irrelevant and an attempt to protract proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

  5. 16-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

  7. 30-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

  8. 18-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

  9. 11-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

  10. 03-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

  11. 17-Feb-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

  12. 05-Feb-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

  13. 20-Jan-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

  14. 17-Dec-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

  15. 06-Dec-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

  16. 29-Nov-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

  17. 11-Nov-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

  18. 04-Nov-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

  19. 16-Oct-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

  20. 09-Oct-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

  21. 12-Sep-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

  22. 28-Aug-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

  23. 22-Jul-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

  24. 16-Jun-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

  25. 21-Apr-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

  26. 19-Mar-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

  27. 03-Mar-2025

    Counter

    Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

  28. 04-Feb-2025

    Counter

    Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

  29. 10-Jan-2025

    Counter

    Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

  30. 26-Nov-2024

    Counter

    Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

  31. 11-Nov-2024

    Counter

    Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

  32. 30-Sep-2024

    Counter

    Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

  33. 30-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 30-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 6333/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Thanjavur, allowed the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition and permitted the accused (Jothimani) to mark a certified copy of a registered sale deed dated 17.10.2018 (Document No. 6045/2018) as additional evidence in his appeal. The court found the registered sale deed to be relevant and material evidence necessary for just adjudication of the cheque dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, particularly regarding the nature of the transaction and existence of legally enforceable liability. The document was admitted as Ex.D1 despite the complainant's objections that it was irrelevant and an attempt to protract proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case