Jothimain.P vs Rajeswari. E Advocate - R.M.Raj — 6333/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 432(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 28th April 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTJ010100172024

Case disposed

Filing Number

7131/2024

Filing Date

30-08-2024

Registration No

6333/2024

Registration Date

30-08-2024

Court

Principal District Court, Thanjavur

Judge

1-Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

Decision Date

28th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 432(2)

Petitioner(s)

Jothimain.P

Adv. Parthiban. K

Respondent(s)

Rajeswari. E Advocate - R.M.Raj

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

28-04-2026

Disposed

22-04-2026

Orders

16-04-2026

Orders

10-04-2026

Orders

30-03-2026

Orders

Final Orders / Judgements

28-04-2026
Copy of Order

Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Thanjavur, allowed the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition and permitted the accused (Jothimani) to mark a certified copy of a registered sale deed dated 17.10.2018 (Document No. 6045/2018) as additional evidence in his appeal. The court found the registered sale deed to be relevant and material evidence necessary for just adjudication of the cheque dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, particularly regarding the nature of the transaction and existence of legally enforceable liability. The document was admitted as Ex.D1 despite the complainant's objections that it was irrelevant and an attempt to protract proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Thanjavur, allowed the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition and permitted the accused (Jothimani) to mark a certified copy of a registered sale deed dated 17.10.2018 (Document No. 6045/2018) as additional evidence in his appeal. The court found the registered sale deed to be relevant and material evidence necessary for just adjudication of the cheque dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, particularly regarding the nature of the transaction and existence of legally enforceable liability. The document was admitted as Ex.D1 despite the complainant's objections that it was irrelevant and an attempt to protract proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Thanjavur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case